Kelowna BC: Enbridge Takes Its Dog and Pony Show to Kelowna
B. McPherson
Here's a group of "environmental terrorists" whose weapon is common sense.
Hundreds of protesters showed up in Kelowna today to
demonstrate against the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway proposal. The
proposal would see a twinned pipeline carrying diluted bitumen or dilbit to the
west coast of British Columbia and solvent east to the pipeline head. The
proposed route would take the pipeline through the most unspoiled area left in
N. America and terminate at Kitimat at the head of Douglas Channel.
Opposition to the proposal has grown exponentially as the
public has become informed of the scope and danger to the environment. In
addition to the unease about driving pipelines, pumping stations and roads
through pristine wilderness is the poor safety record of this company. First
Nations bands in BC have outstanding land claims and they are united in their
opposition to this project.
Many people are starting to think that the fix is in and
this public consultation procedure is a sham. The federal government has
already made its stance clear that it wants the pipeline to proceed. The
Alberta premier is more than keen that the bitumen destined for Asia travel
this way. Enbridge has been advertising in BC telling people how great the
project would be while showing Douglas Channel as a shoal and island free
passageway.
Now that the hearing have moved to its latest stages, dealing
only with route changes, Enbridge has slipped in a proposal to increase the
capacity of the tank farm on the BC coast. An independent intervener has
exposed new plans in the proposal.
“Wier goes on to say: “It is everyone’s guess why there is a doubling of the tank farm capacity, but certainly points out to the larger pipeline shipping volumes the company had indicated would be a possible Phase II of the project.” She says: “It looks like Northern Gateway is quietly moving into the 850,000 barrels a day proposal, twice the volume the application has been cross-examined about. It is clearly an abuse of process.” Josette Weir
There are a myriad of issues arising from this proposed
mega-project but safety looms large. Enbridge has already acknowledged that
spills will occur. They have a very sorry record of their cleanup efforts on
the Kalamazoo River in Michigan. It has been two years since a ruptured
pipeline spewed dilbit into the river. Because the sludgey goo must be diluted
and heated to make it flow, when it hits the cold water it sinks. The EPA is
now, two years later, demanding that Enbridge dredge the river to remove as
much of the product as possible. Enbridge is resisting.
If you build it, it will leak.
Comments
Post a Comment